Multiple Agency Coordination in Emergency Response

Share this post

Response planning coordination between private and public entities improves emergency management capabilities. When establishing, updating, exercising, and implementing response plans, partnering with associated response participants will result in a more successful and streamlined implementation of emergency plans.

In a 2010 press release, FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate stated, "There's no way government can solve the challenges of a disaster with a government-centric approach. It takes the whole team. And the private sector provides the bulk of the services every day in the community.”

When a disaster strikes at a company facility, a response typically involves outside response groups and corresponding government agencies. Through collaborative planning, the following multifaceted concepts can be incorporated in a coordinated emergency management program:

  • Proven and successful response models and best practices
  • Effective tools and equipment from a variety of sources
  • Training and exercises

The goal of multi-agency coordination is to prioritize and organize the need for critical resources, thereby assisting the coordination of the response operations. A coordinated effort should consist of a combination of agreed upon elements including:

  • Personnel
  • Procedures
  • Protocols
  • Business practices
  • Communications systems and methods

The most commonly used elements in a coordinated response are Emergency Operation Centers (EOCs) and Multiagency Coordination Systems (MACS). An EOC is a central command facility, activated to support response operations in the event of an incident.

According to FEMA, MAC Groups are typically comprised of administrators/executives, or their appointed representatives. MAC Groups may also be known as multi-agency committees or emergency management committees. There are seven common functions that MACS will generally perform during an incident:

  1. Assessment
  2. Prioritization
  3. Acquisition and allocation of critical resources
  4. Supporting relevant incident management policies and interagency activities
  5. Coordination with other MACS
  6. Coordination with elected and appointed officials
  7. Coordination of information
Comments

More blog posts from Jensen Hughes


Preventing Structural Deterioration of Reinforced Concrete High-Rises Through Investigation and Early-Detection

Oct 21, 2021

The collapse of Champlain Condominium Towers South in FL, increased scrutiny on the conditions of reinforced concrete

Read more
Determining the Right Level of Protection for Combustible Dust Hazards

Oct 14, 2021

A Dust Hazard Analysis helps you determine the proper levels of protection needed in your facility – every case is different.

Read more
Utilizing Web-Based Response Planning Systems to Maximize Emergency Preparedness

Oct 13, 2021

October 13 is Disaster Risk Reduction Day — having an emergency preparedness plan can help you stay alert and ready.

Read more